Coordinating Creditors
نویسندگان
چکیده
The market for developing country sovereign debt has become increasingly competitive. Is this necessarily good for welfare? Or, is there scope for beneficial government intervention to reduce competition, and promote coordination, among creditors? This paper reviews recent theoretical work on the market for developing country sovereign debt that shows that competition can reduce welfare. Further, it argues that while private sector creditor organizations have been successful at coordinating existing creditors in history, government intervention to discourage entry by new creditors may be welfare improving today. In the past three decades, the market for developing economy sovereign lending has grown increasingly competitive. Advances in telecommunications and the removal of capital market regulations have reduced the costs of doing business. At the same ∗Department of Economics, Stanford University, Stanford CA 94305-5072 (email: [email protected]). This paper has been prepared for the January 2005 Meetings of the American Economic Association in Philadelphia. I thank Liran Einav, Christine Groeger, Prakash Kannan, Narayana Kocherlakota, Nan Li, Fabrizio Perri and Chris Phelan for comments. A technical appendix detailing some of the arguments from the text is available at http://www.stanford.edu/~mlwright/.
منابع مشابه
Debt Restructuring with Multiple Creditors and the Role of Exchange Offers*
Exploiting the analogy with the private provision of a public good, this paper studies debt restructuring with an arbitrary number of creditors using mechanism design. Creditors differ in the value they expect to receive in bankruptcy, and this value is private information. As with public goods, too little debt forgiveness is granted in equilibrium relative to the first best. Creditors are more...
متن کاملStrategic Debt Restructuring
We analyze a distressed firm indebted to many creditors. The firm’s owners have the option of choosing the sequence of restructuring negotiations with the creditors. We show that sequencing flexibility is beneficial to firm owners, and that the optimal sequencing of restructuring negotiations involves exploiting the firm’s liabilities to some creditors so as to moderate the demands of others. M...
متن کاملRe research and comparative study of the principle of pari passu in Iran and England legal system
Abstract When a company exposed to liquidation process the most important question is how its property should distribute between creditors. Since after the bankruptcy, creditors scramble to the property of insolvent an orderly and systematic framework is needed to scheduled this process in order to avoid more detriment and assist the insolvent to reorganize the business. Principle of equali...
متن کاملPolitical Risk and Sovereign Debt Contracts
Default on sovereign debt is a form of political risk. Issuers and creditors have responded to this risk both by strengthening the terms in sovereign debt contracts that enable creditors to enforce their debts judicially and by creating terms that enable sovereigns to restructure their debts. These apparently contradictory approaches reflect attempts to solve an incomplete contracting problem i...
متن کاملDebt restructuring and voting rules Preliminary and incomplete
The voting arrangements used by creditors during debt restructuring are prespecified, often by statute. For example, U.S. law stipulates the use of a unanimous vote outside bankruptcy, but a supermajority vote in Chapter 11 bankrupcty. We analyze the effect of voting rules on the welfare of debtors and their creditors in restructuring negotiations. When creditors are close to rational and marke...
متن کامل